dansolomon.com
i give that shit the finger
Home / Ask Me Anything / about / clips / contact / archive
[Flash 9 is required to listen to audio.]
Track: I Will Always Love You
Caption:

fleetfoxessing:

“I Will Always Love You” by Whitney Houston (originally by Dolly Parton)

Watch Whitney’s version.

Watch Dolly’s version.

Fleet Foxes Sing* started with a Whitney Houston song, and I reckon it’s only appropriate that he cover another one today. I love the way you can find new things in songs when you interpret them this way — the opening here reminds vintage doo-wop, something that isn’t present in either recording of “I Will Always Love You” (or in Fleet Foxes music) but which makes sense when you combine those two things. A neat little chemical reaction.

*Fleet Foxes Sing is not Fleet Foxes. Just some dude who sings like them.

Source : soundcloud.com

Not gonna front, still get chills listening to this song.

[Flash 9 is required to listen to audio.]
Track: Loose in the Knees
Artist: Monarchs
Caption:

Today’s song: “Loose In The Knees,” Monarchs

I really liked Monarchs’ 2011 album, a pretty, lush, folk/country-style endeavor that was both of a kind with other Austin bands I like and an example of what that sort of music can be at its best. The singer, Celeste Griffin, has a brassy sound that I really appreciated — so many singers who make that kind of music play up their voices as hushed, fragile instruments, which sometimes wears me out.

But I was not expecting a lot from the press release I got a few weeks ago that declared that she’d made a hip-hop EP called Ft. Celeste. The “folky white girl goes hip-hop” thing is usually a gimmick that borders on cultural appropriation (think Karmin).

Anyway, those are two kinda negative paragraphs up there! Which is silly, because Ft. Celeste is a neat little record. (“Little” is a fair descriptor — it runs just over ten minutes for five songs.) “Loose In The Knees” borrows a beat from Javelin, and Griffin sounds really comfortable inhabiting it, riding the beat with utmost sincerity and treating hip-hop like something she is having a fuckin’ blastplaying with. The whole EP (available for free here) is like that — a bit tentative at times (three of the five songs are shorter than 90 seconds long), but an expression of love for hip-hop that is really delightful. I’ve listened to it a lot the past few weeks.

Source : http
[Flash 9 is required to listen to audio.]
Track: Off To The Races
Artist: Lana Del Rey
Caption:

Today’s song: “Off To The Races,” Lana Del Rey

1.
This was the first Lana Del Rey song that I heard that really stood out for me. I liked “Video Games” well enough — it’s a sad, pretty song, when you strip it of the controversy and context of it, and I always have room for that sort of thing — but “Off To The Races” felt like something a little different. It’s still full of the same sad prettiness, but it’s much more propulsive, with the pseudo-rapping in the chorus and the way the drums come in after the intro. It’s a cool song, and most of the real appeal of Lana Del Rey breaks down into the fact that she’s cool, highly stylized and important to the right-now. So it captures her well.

2.
I was listening to the song at my desk a week or two ago (it was on the EP she released to tease the album), and Kat came walking by and did her Lana Del Rey impression (she doesn’t like her). When LDR hit the baby-talk chorus — the “I’m your little harlot / blah blah blah” part, Kat jumped right into that register. It was funny, and it catches a lot of what people hate about her, too. The pandering, Annie’s-song-in-the-Community-Christmas-episode “sexy baby” thing she has going on. The lines that stand out in the song on first listen really do infantilize her: “Be a good baby, do what I want”; “I’m crazy, baby, I need you to come here and save me”; “kiss me on my open mouth, ready for you”; “keep me forever, tell me you own me”; “I’m so crazy, baby, I’m sorry that I’m misbehaving, I’m your little harlot”; “I’d die without him”; etc, etc — look at it in black and white, and it reads like exhibits A-F in The People Vs. Lana Del Rey’s Pandering To The Impulses Of Dudes Who Want A Servile Woman To Swim Around In A Bikini To Thank Them For Rescuing Her.

3.
In fact, this comes up a lot when talking about Lana Del Rey. Half of the criticism is the sort of basic slut-shaming that likes to see a pretty girl fail at something because she probably didn’t earn her success, and look at those lips, she totally get plastic surgery when Her People came in and took her and created this image and gave her this new name and identity, and she’s so inauthentic….

4.
Which is weird, right? Because, like, nobody talks about how A$AP Rocky is all inauthentic because he self-released some music that caught ears at a big label who decided to package him as the Next Big Thing. They don’t go on and on about his handlers and the people pulling his strings. They don’t talk about Skrillex like he’s some guy who wanted to get famous at any cost, who was kind of placed on a fame-carousel and when the first bite at the apple as a pop-punk guitarist didn’t work, the machine jumped to turn him into a hot-shit dubstep act. They don’t strip those dudes of their agency despite the fact that their stories are not really any more inspiring or authentic than “daughter of dot-com billionaire makes record under Disney-sounding real name ‘Lizzy Grant,’ then re-emerges a year later as Mad Men-inspired sexpot Lana Del Rey!” A$AP Rocky is the savior of hip-hop and Skrillex is mega-important, and neither of those dudes is a DIY act struggling under his real name without the machine of what remains of the music industry behind them. And that’s fine — James Osterberg and Robert Zimmerman and guys like that, they came from similar places — but it’s only Lana Del Rey who has a zillion angry posts coming from every direction about how she’s fake and sucks and a product.

5.
So anyway, there’s the other half of the criticism, which comes from feminism, or the feminist-minded, and it looks at the lines like the ones from “Off To The Races” and states — as this dude who’s friends with a friend of mine did when we were discussing her on Facebook — that “not since the mid-1960s has a female artist done more to roll back the clock on women’s rights in her music.” They dismiss with hasty derision, as this post by a dude who writes for Austinist does, the “bored theoreticians who will prop up her weak work by insisting she’s doing some kind of complicated gender dance, toying with power and submission,” and insist that “reality” is just that she sucks, and is selling out her gender by writing songs that appeal so blatantly to the male libido — that, ultimately, it’s all about dudes.

6.
Which brings us back to “Off To The Races,” which is a song I decided to spend more time with after hearing the baby-talk bits and getting sucked into the Lana Del Rey Drama of 2012. Like, I actually listened to the rest of the words to the song and stuff.

Here’s what I found: It’s a pretty by-the-numbers Chandler-esque noir story, really, but this time told from the point of view of the woman. She’s a Vegas girl with a dark secret, living on the run, and she’s hooked herself to some bad guy to keep somebody tough between her and the past. Not exactly the first rendition of this tale we’ve ever heard, but cool, and legit. It also means that, when she dips into the sexy-baby stuff, she’s singing directly to this fictional guy, and the character she’s playing in the song does this as a means of manipulation. It’s not really that complicated: the words are right here, and they’re pretty direct. It’s a Dashiell Hammett story about a femme fatale, but she’s the only character we get. It’s not groundbreaking, but it’s not the same as a crass “boop-da-boop-de-boop SEX!” play on her audience.

7.
Which is what really gets to me about all of the Lana Del Rey stuff: the notion that she is this thing, this creation of the moneyed-up Music Industry Machine designed to appeal directly to the libidos of male critics (that’s nearly a direct quote from a now-deleted Tumblr post from Amy Andronicus, I think), as opposed to an artist, and a storyteller. Because she sings pop songs, and so she’s singing mostly in the first person to “a you that the singer sings to” (as Ani Difranco put it way back when), and so there’s not much audible difference between a song that sings to “you” from the singer’s point of view, and one in which the singer is playing a role. It all sounds kind of the same, and we have an easy time mixing it up.

8.
I mean, last week we all got super psyched about someone who claimed to figure out what day was Ice Cube’s good day.

9.
But obviously she is telling stories in her songs, because “Off To The Races” is about a girl who’s at risk of getting sent to Ryker’s Island for whatever bad shit she did in her past. Lana Del Rey is in no more danger of going to Ryker’s Island than Ice Cube is of spotting the words “Ice Cube’s a pimp” on the Goodyear Blimp, as J Smooth put it last week. So the notion that this isn’t any sort of commentary, that she’s not playing a role, is just weird. And — yeah — sexist.

10.
Because when Matthew Weiner creates a subservient, sexpot in early 60’s dress, nobody complains that he’s rolling back the clock on women’s rights for creating Betty Draper. Because we’re prepared to see his art — like that of A$AP Rocky, and Skrillex — as the authentic creations of a man who is saying something. But we treat the very notion that Lana Del Rey might actually have something to say, and a viewpoint behind her art, and some personal agency of her own, as theories created by bored people who are building complexity into the work that couldn’t possibly be there intentionally.

11.
And, you know, fuck that. Because “Off To The Races” is a pretty good song, and it may not be breaking new ground for gender equality or whatever, but since when is that a requirement of every woman who picks up a fucking microphone? That’s the thing about Lana Del Rey: she’ll never be considered in the same terms as an A$AP Rocky or a Skrillex — that is, as a musician — but only ever as a product, only ever as a statement. It’s always going to be about what she means, even if you’re defending her. And, yeah, I’m sure she’s crying about that all the way to the bank or whatever, but there’s something kind of fucked up about the fact that “manufactured” dude stars like those guys just get to rock shows and put out new music, while she has to either be selling out her entire gender, or she has to be defended in terms that elevate her above these things.

12.
Fact is, it’s just a pretty fucking good record. Compelling stories, strong melodies, sad-but-not-too-sad, well-produced and really easy to listen to. Maybe we can let the rest of that shit go, for a while, and just enjoy her music. Cool?

(note: while I was working on this, Jessica Hopper went live with a story with similar points for Spin, which features more actual reporting from people who know her and less swearing. You should read it. As for me, I’ll just be psyched to be in similar company to Hopper, who is a very smart writer.)

Source : soundcloud.com

Today’s song: “Main Street,” Deer Tick

I never really cared much for Deer Tick’s music before, and I probably wouldn’t even have listened to the album that this song was on except that I was assigned a write-up of this video. To my surprise, I really connected with the song immediately. It’s funny what you can find in places you’re not looking.

It opens almost exactly the same as the Afghan Whigs version of “Will You Still Love Me Tomorrow,” which maybe had a subconscious effect, but really, it just reminds me of what Nirvana might have become, if Kurt Cobain had lived and gotten really into alt-country at some point. It’s at a carefully-orchestrated mid-tempo throughout, with a pair of undeniable hooks — in the chorus, and at the start of each verse. It’s all of the things that Nirvana was good at, but it also sounds contemporary and like the pain that John McCauley is expressing is his own — this isn’t pastiche (which was my problem with so much of Deer Tick’s music in the past), it’s something original. It reinterprets their influences, but it’s every bit their own. And it really does sound great.

Here’s a new story I wrote over at CultureMap:
Chaos in Tejas lives up to its name: One Nazi skinhead band dropped from music fest lineup, but questions still remain 
First off, how fucking absurd is it that Nazi skinheads are still a thing? Nazis are the guys Captain America punches out. This should be so fucking obsolete it would be like writing about a band of Cylons at Coachella.
Second — wow. I like Chaos In Tejas and have had fun there in the past, and they’re certainly allowed to book whoever they want, Nazis or not. But I want any band with Nazi ties — even if they’re not explicitly Nazi bands themselves — to feel very, very marginalized all of the time.
I know Disma is the hot shit of Death Metal right now, and NPR and Pitchfork and all of these people are hot on the band, but their singer also is still signing and numbering re-releases of his Nazi side project. He declined to answer questions, and this email from Daryl Kahan — who was in Citizen’s Arrest so all you punk rockers know is totally not a Nazi — isn’t really compelling:

Just to set the record straight  “Disma has absolutely nothing to do  with politics nor does the band support or condone racist beliefs or  nazi ideology of any kind.  Craig may have a questionable past but he  has put that behind him and is solely focused on what the band is doing  now.”   We knew that when he joined the band and are not surprised by  this inquiry.  Craig is a great vocalist and an old friend of mine and I  stand by him in what we are doing with Disma

I’m sure he’s solely focused on what the band is doing now, because there’s a chance that it might actually make him some money. But having a sneaky side project (go read the link at CultureMap) where he’s signing Stormfuhrer records for a Nazi label under the table means that I want these guys to be alienated all the time. I’m sure their record is super cool, but there’s a cost of recruiting a Nazi to sing for your band, and that should be that it is really hard for your non-Nazi group to get bookings.
In short: fuck Nazis, obviously. And fuck a music festival that I was looking forward to until it dumps the Nazi-affiliated acts. It’s not censorship to say that you want these motherfuckers extremely marginalized, and you want any band that does business with them to have to struggle to book decent shows. Tolerating just a little bit of white power/anti-Semitic/Nazi bullshit, and suggesting that it’s okay as long as they keep it to their other bands, or that they’re not really Nazis, they just put out records with Nazis, is dangerous. They have the right to book whatever they want at Chaos In Tejas, but I hope that people don’t buy tickets, and I hope that venues refuse to host the shows, until these bands are off. We have that right, too.

Here’s a new story I wrote over at CultureMap:

Chaos in Tejas lives up to its name: One Nazi skinhead band dropped from music fest lineup, but questions still remain

First off, how fucking absurd is it that Nazi skinheads are still a thing? Nazis are the guys Captain America punches out. This should be so fucking obsolete it would be like writing about a band of Cylons at Coachella.

Second — wow. I like Chaos In Tejas and have had fun there in the past, and they’re certainly allowed to book whoever they want, Nazis or not. But I want any band with Nazi ties — even if they’re not explicitly Nazi bands themselves — to feel very, very marginalized all of the time.

I know Disma is the hot shit of Death Metal right now, and NPR and Pitchfork and all of these people are hot on the band, but their singer also is still signing and numbering re-releases of his Nazi side project. He declined to answer questions, and this email from Daryl Kahan — who was in Citizen’s Arrest so all you punk rockers know is totally not a Nazi — isn’t really compelling:

Just to set the record straight  “Disma has absolutely nothing to do with politics nor does the band support or condone racist beliefs or nazi ideology of any kind.  Craig may have a questionable past but he has put that behind him and is solely focused on what the band is doing now.”   We knew that when he joined the band and are not surprised by this inquiry.  Craig is a great vocalist and an old friend of mine and I stand by him in what we are doing with Disma

I’m sure he’s solely focused on what the band is doing now, because there’s a chance that it might actually make him some money. But having a sneaky side project (go read the link at CultureMap) where he’s signing Stormfuhrer records for a Nazi label under the table means that I want these guys to be alienated all the time. I’m sure their record is super cool, but there’s a cost of recruiting a Nazi to sing for your band, and that should be that it is really hard for your non-Nazi group to get bookings.

In short: fuck Nazis, obviously. And fuck a music festival that I was looking forward to until it dumps the Nazi-affiliated acts. It’s not censorship to say that you want these motherfuckers extremely marginalized, and you want any band that does business with them to have to struggle to book decent shows. Tolerating just a little bit of white power/anti-Semitic/Nazi bullshit, and suggesting that it’s okay as long as they keep it to their other bands, or that they’re not really Nazis, they just put out records with Nazis, is dangerous. They have the right to book whatever they want at Chaos In Tejas, but I hope that people don’t buy tickets, and I hope that venues refuse to host the shows, until these bands are off. We have that right, too.

[Flash 9 is required to listen to audio.]
Track: You Belong With Me
Artist: For All Those Sleeping
Caption:

One of my weird compulsions is to listen to this ridiculous cash-in covers series called Punk Goes Pop. For the most part, it’s a fascinating look at how meaningless both of those terms are in that context — hearing some band called The Ready Set play “Airplanes” by B.O.B. and making it even more poppy than the original recording is proof that, I dunno, kids today are gonna grow up and have no idea what punk rock means to old-timers or something.

Still, every so often you get a band who decides to totally metalcore out a Taylor Swift song, and even though it’s obviously formulaic, there’s something inherently satisfying about it anyway.

Fun Fun Fun Fest in review →

At a time when trend-chasing (or even, if you want to be generous, attempts at trend-setting) is the only way anyone can think of to try to keep up with a music landscape that is ever-changing, uncertain and laden with an extremely short attention span, Slayer is a singular, iconic artist. It’s more appealing now than ever, to more people than ever, to hear a band that just does what they do without any of those other concerns. They like to play fast songs about death, destruction and Satan. They’ve been doing it for three decades. If you don’t like it, go watch Odd Future.

We live in uncertain times, but some things do not change. All hail Slayer.

I spent most of the weekend at Fun Fun Fun Fest, which lived up to its name. I was there, officially, to scout out some neat bits of music-culture weirdness for MTV Hive, which will start rolling out shortly, and did some moonlighting for my pals at CultureMap while I was there.

The above paragraphs come from the write-up I did for Slayer (duh), and there is more to be found in the links below.

I had a good time trying to contextualize all of the things I saw, because I think small festivals like Fun Fun Fun offer some interesting opportunities to get at the pulse of what people are into culturally in an increasingly fractured culture. The festival was huge, and absolutely packed with people, but it’s not an all-things-to-all-people event like Austin City Limits or Coachella — there’s a definite aesthetic here, and it’s designed to appeal to a few different types of people, finding what they have in common. How do Odd Future and Slayer and Major Lazer and Danzig and Passion Pit and Blonde Redhead and Public Enemy and Spoon all fit together? They all appeal to the nebulous beast known as the American Hipster, but there are people who feel passionate toward all of those artists who don’t fit that descriptor, if it means anything at all, in the slightest. What does the opportunity to see them all together offer?

I don’t know for sure that I found any answers, but I enjoyed very much trying to piece it together. Here are the CultureMap stories:

Today in bulletpoints.

  • Wake up late, but actually early because of Daylight Savings Time.
  • Nice phone call with my dad while walking the dog to pick up breakfast tacos.
  • Home for breakfast tacos with Kat.
  • Football.
  • Ride bike to Auditorium Shores to watch Henry Rollins(!) officiate a wedding(!!) at Fun Fun Fun Fest.
  • Duck out to a sports bar to watch the second half of Broncos/Raiders on one TV, Packers/Chargers on another, and Giants/Patriots on a third, all of which are amazing games.
  • Back to Fun Fun Fun Fest in time for Rollins’ comedy set.
  • SLAYER
  • Pleasant bike ride home in time to catch the crucial last five minutes of the Steelers/Ravens game.
  • Waiting for pizza delivery.

Strong candidate for Best Day Of The Year.

On music.

I am 31 years old, which is an age at which a few things have been happening for a while, for many people: One, life moves much more quickly. That line in that Pink Floyd song about and then one day you find / ten years have got behind you that seemed absurd when you were sixteen and listening to it in Jason’s basement, because how could anyone lose ten years, starts to make sense. When you’re sixteen, ten years is more than half your life. You can’t possibly imagine not noticing all of the time that’s passed since you were six. Even when you are in your early twenties — the decade between 13 and 23 is a big fucking decade. But as you get older, your perspective on time necessarily changes. Waiting until next Christmas, when you are eight years old, seems impossible, because you’ve only had eight of those things so far. But it sneaks up on your when you’re this age, because it’s just one of thirty-some Christmases you’ve seen. This is not a failure of passion or imagination — it is simple mathematics. Time doesn’t literally move faster as you get older, but your ability to perceive it within the context of your life changes dramatically, and in such a way that it may as well literally move faster.

Two, the role of music in your life often changes. This, too, is to be expected. When you are seventeen, every song you love speaks to your life, because your life is probably about people who inspire you or make you feel gooshy when you see them or about wanting to get out of your small town or about having big dreams or about being sad because you love someone who doesn’t love you back — and those are things that songs convey perfectly. It is very easy to be in love with pop music as a teenager, because it is the most accurate and compelling mirror to your life that you can find. (It’s come to my attention, incidentally, that High Fidelity is actually about a man who refuses to mature because he fears losing the ability to connect to these songs more than he fears being alone. It is a sadder story in that context, but more useful.)

Anyway, you get older and the number of people writing songs that are about things you care about as much as you cared about those things when you were seventeen is much smaller. Maybe you hit a divorce or a major breakup, and if you didn’t waste Blood On The Tracks on the fact that Laura didn’t like you back when you were eighteen, you’ve got that one. But it’s a search — and then when you find someone like Jeffrey Lewis or Craig Finn or David Dondero, who speaks to your current situation the way that, I dunno, Ben Folds or whoever spoke to you as a teenager, you hold on to them with both hands.

I am a music writer, at least some of the time, but there are times when I am deeply bored with new music. The themes are dull, the sounds remind me of things that I heard back when it was easier to relate to music, and the experience of seeking out new bands to be passionate about just reminds me of how much I’d really rather be listening to Mojave 3 or Carla Bozulich.

This year, I have been fortunate to have a lot of room for new music in my life. And I have realized that this mitigates the pace at which life moves as you age. I’m listening to my 2011 Music playlist in iTunes right now, and I’ve got Burst Apart by The Antlers on right now. It’s a lovely record, of course — I have made friends with these songs, and they keep me company on nights like tonight, when I am through with going to bed early and want to hear things that mean something to me. But it also feels very much like a record I used to listen to, back in the old days of, like, this past May. Listening to Tell Me by Jessica Lea Mayfield tonight makes this past February feel like it was a thousand years ago. “Go Outside” feels like it came out a thousand years ago. If I put on High Violet, it will sound like I first heard it when I was in high school. This music that I have loved recently, it all feels like it comes from the past now.

This is amazing. In so many ways, life feels like it is always moving more and more quickly. But loving new songs is a chance to slow that down, to make things that happened six months ago feel like ancient history. This is very important.